I found the JBL Charge 3 beat the Beats Pill+ in every performance category – the Charge 3 lasts 8 hours longer, is waterproof and offers rich, balanced sound for $80 (about £60, AU$106) less. Final verdictĬompared to the competition, the Beats Pill+ is just too expensive and middle-of-a-crowded-road to recommend. However, the biggest knock against the Beats Pill+ is its sound, which might be good for playing back rap, electronic and pop music, but falls flat with every other genre. It can't pair with multiple devices and its battery life is merely average. That said, it's hard to justify spending $230 (£190, AU$360) on the Beats Pill+ when there are at a least a half-dozen better speakers available for much less money. The speaker doubles as a battery pack and speakerphone as well, which are nice additional features. Not only is its build quality excellent, but sound quality is good, too … as long as you don't mind Beat's signature bass emphasis. We likedįirst off, it can't be overstated how much better the Beats Pill+ is over the original speaker. With myriad other better-performing bluetooth speakers out there, the big draws here are a solid build quality and bass-heavy approach to playback. So who is the Beats Pill+ good for? Anyone looking to put style over substance. Besides dual playback, the app also lets you and a friend "DJ" together by controlling a playlist and playback from two separate devices. If you feel compelled to rock out to two Bluetooth speakers, Beats does let you pair up two Pills+ speakers for stereo playback or to amplify sound, however you'll need to download the Beats Pill+ app for Android or iOS in order to take advantage of the feature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |